lauralh: (the cheat is not dead)
[personal profile] lauralh
I have a theory about gender. Well, several. Not just about gender, i mean it's all interconnected.

anyway here's the basics of it:
1) in today's society, there is no way to differentiate between nature vs. nurture, and in fact they both interact with each other as a sort of feedback loop. So a girl may have a slight tendency to be tomboyish or uberfemme, and being encouraged to do either will increase the tendencies.

2) culturally1 speaking, the way little girls socialize is kind of wacky and, as I didn't have any female friends as a child2, I don't really understand it.

3) girls who had lots of female friends as children then grow up into that standard stereotype of woman more or less. You know the kind, the kind that misogynists describe.

4) girls who didn't don't so much, but there may still be tendencies, so if they get female friends in high school of the former type, they might be pushed that "standard woman" direction. Although if they get friends like them it's not as pronounced, or nonexistent.

5) these girls also have far more male friends than female friends, if any.

so anyway these are sort of my "working rules of thumb" that i have, mostly based on anecdotal evidence but, nonetheless serving me well enough. needless to say I try to hang out with the "male-socialized" females rather than the "female-socialized" females when I can.

[1] north american culture is all I can speak for.
[2] well, I had a couple, and was mystified when they totally stopped talking to me during the school year.

Date: 2004-05-27 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alicetiara.livejournal.com
What's wrong with being gossipy and fashion obsessed?

Date: 2004-05-27 03:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hotcrab.livejournal.com
nothing. its just what she means by standard steroptype women

Date: 2004-05-27 03:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
well, not really, although that's an aspect; I also mean the victim-types.

Date: 2004-05-27 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alicetiara.livejournal.com
Oh, OK. That helps.

I guess fashion-obsessed might actually be one case of when I think being socialized (by friends OR family) as super girlie might matter, but I do know lots of people who've gone back and forth between being fashion/trendy and not fashion/trendy at various times, regardless of upbringing. I certainly was not socialized to be fashionable, as all my little girlfriends were frumpy nerds and my mom's taste is awful, but I just love clothes and always have.

Gossipy/catty, no. Gay men are stereotypically both. How's that explained?

Date: 2004-05-27 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hotcrab.livejournal.com
because they are trying to be more girly than girls?

Date: 2004-05-28 09:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wanton-bliss.livejournal.com
Don't make me take off my shoe and do damage!

Date: 2004-05-28 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
MEOW!@!!!

honestly I will say that straight guys can be just as gossipy as girls/gay men.

No shit, but stereotypes do exist for a reason.

Date: 2004-05-28 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wanton-bliss.livejournal.com
As an admitted misogynist, I will say that I find it highly unlikely that I am a catty bitch because I am trying to emulate women in any way, shape or form.

Steve needs to learn that being a cunt isn't a lifestyle choice; it's genetic.

Profile

lauralh: (Default)
Laural Hill

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011121314 15
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 3rd, 2026 01:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios