lauralh: (Default)
[personal profile] lauralh
[Poll #290279]

*you cannot be this person, sorry.

Date: 2004-05-07 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mylastsigh.livejournal.com
* = shucks

Date: 2004-05-07 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crasch.livejournal.com
I'd prefer that the right of secession be as widely recognized as the right of free speech, or private property. That way, if you don't like your existing government, you can either secede to join another government, or you can start your own country. The result, I think, would be a bunch of little countries each with their own form of government. You could then pick and choose the kind of government you like best, but no government could get too out of hand because a big chunk of citizens would just break off and leave.

I nominate: A CARDBOARD BOX

Date: 2004-05-07 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] velvet.livejournal.com
For: TERM-LIMITED DEITY

"And God did say to Abraham, 'You must kill your only begotten son, Isaac.'"

"And yea, Abraham did say to God, 'What's that? I can't hear you. You'll have to speak into the microphone.'

"And God did say, 'Oh, I'm sorry. Is this better? Check. Check, check check.'"

Date: 2004-05-07 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] da-guru.livejournal.com
real anarchy is more complex than being no ruler. it's kinda a communal concept of self-rule. i dig it.

Date: 2004-05-11 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aefirpo.livejournal.com
That's not anarchy. That's anarcho-syndicalism.

And it still sucks.

Date: 2004-05-11 07:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
right on baby, right on

Date: 2004-05-07 11:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] babycola.livejournal.com
I live in a Monarchy. The royal family have no political power but I still wish they'd be more dead than they currently are.

Date: 2004-05-10 03:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theplateauphase.livejournal.com
I'm an LJ-mate of [livejournal.com profile] djpekky and [livejournal.com profile] mrs_trax, so hello.

As for explaining my answer, I am fond of the idea that Emma Goldman had about anarchy...that it was not some naive and impractical way of living or something chaotic and fractured, but that it's an ideological re-examination of what's natural in life and in human essence. That's the simplest I could possibly summarise it.

Profile

lauralh: (Default)
Laural Hill

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011121314 15
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 04:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios