poor boys

Dec. 19th, 2005 11:10 am
lauralh: (licked again!)
[personal profile] lauralh
"There are no 'small and short' stores," Courtemanche noted as he brushed his hand across a row of 38-inch waist dress pants on a recent afternoon. "This is now the average. . . . It's kind of sad. A 34 is considered small."

Reading my Esquire I learned about "the six-inch drop", which means that most suits are designed for chests being 6 inches bigger than the waist. They acknowledged that this is not as common as designers would like, and gave some advice. I asked Reg what his sizes were. "Thirty-eight and thirty-two." HE IS A TOTAL KEN DOLL.

Date: 2005-12-19 07:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skipbreakfast.livejournal.com
This is the total TRUTH. I wearing a 32 waist/ 34 inseam and CAN NEVER FIND PANTS OR JEANS THAT FIT. Too many fucking fat guys everywhere...

Date: 2005-12-19 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
that's the same thing reg wears. I think it's actually a pretty common size, and that's why you can't find pants that fit.

Date: 2005-12-19 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skipbreakfast.livejournal.com
Some shops have stopped carring that size because the waist is too small.

Date: 2005-12-20 07:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
are you serious? we live in the land of heroin addicts. when I'm with Reg we will see every other size (including say 28/34).

Date: 2005-12-19 11:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altamira16.livejournal.com
You think that is bad. My guy is a 31/34. Try finding that anywhere. We run across several 32/34s in our searches. And you know when we ask anyone for a 31/34, they kinda laugh.

Date: 2005-12-19 11:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skipbreakfast.livejournal.com
You can't. He needs belts.

Date: 2005-12-20 12:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altamira16.livejournal.com
Actually, he gets them online from JCPenney. :)

Date: 2005-12-19 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freyja.livejournal.com
*that* makes a news story? i should complain to them about bra shopping-- now that's a fucking disaster.

Date: 2005-12-19 07:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skipbreakfast.livejournal.com
You're not a man. Look in any department store and you'll find that the ratio of women's clothing to men's is usually 4:1, if not 5:1.

Date: 2005-12-19 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freyja.livejournal.com
and (i'm guessing?) you don't have boobs. i notice you mention the ratio of women's clothing but not the ratio of women's bra sizes in stores! just because we have more "clothing" to choose from doesn't mean i can necessarily wear more of it...

eh, i'm not going to elaborate on my specific problem here, but trust me, the issues are quite similar.

though i'll tell you, they can't seem to make a decent pair of women's cargo pants, so i guess i am affected by the men's clothing problem too. ;)

Date: 2005-12-19 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
well look at the date

Date: 2005-12-19 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freyja.livejournal.com
well it was "news" back then :P

Date: 2005-12-19 07:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iamdonte.livejournal.com
i'm glad that they mentioned the athletic cut in that article. that was my saving grace when i went suit shopping last year, since i'm more along the lines of the 12 inch drop. it still doesn't keep me from having to get shirts tailored (even the fitted ones), but it's at least a start.

Date: 2005-12-19 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skipbreakfast.livejournal.com
I heard that! I always have to look for athletic cut shirts. You don't see pants that way though. Do you?

Date: 2005-12-19 07:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wurmwyd.livejournal.com
Hi there!

It's kind of sad. A 34 is considered small."

YAYYY!!! I'M ... SKINNY!!!"

Suddenly happy with my 34 inch waist. :D

Date: 2005-12-19 07:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] llarian.livejournal.com
haha, that's totally what I was thinking. Who knew that 34 was skinny?

Date: 2005-12-19 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xol0tl.livejournal.com
Yet another reason to move to Europe...

Date: 2005-12-19 11:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mindme.livejournal.com
Yeah I always say when you hit your 30s, if your age stays ahead of your waist size you're doing okay.

Date: 2005-12-19 11:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altamira16.livejournal.com
*Insert something witty about Reg's plastic non-existent genitalia.*

Date: 2005-12-20 12:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] velvet.livejournal.com
*Insert Reg's plastic non-existent genitalia into an uncomfortable place.*

Date: 2005-12-20 01:11 am (UTC)

Date: 2005-12-20 03:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jimbojones.livejournal.com
::blinks:: wait, so a six inch V-taper is supposed to be *unusual?*

Date: 2005-12-20 07:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
It's not supposed to be, but according to my comments...

Date: 2005-12-20 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jimbojones.livejournal.com
When I wore suits I had to get them MASSIVELY tailored. And the dress shirts were even worse. Because it turns out that the designers assume if you have a 17" neck, well you just MUST have a gut like a circus freak.

Date: 2005-12-24 05:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crumblingchaos.livejournal.com
Ha, there was a time I wore 32 waist / 36 inseam.

I'm glad I put some weight on because its a hella lot easier to find 34 / 36.

Only my mom had the skills to find 32/36 where I'm the 5min shopper. if I can't find it in 5 min then I'm not buying anything.

Profile

lauralh: (Default)
Laural Hill

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011121314 15
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 3rd, 2026 09:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios