lauralh: (cynical or sarcastic)
[personal profile] lauralh
I think self-tanners have got to be the most retarded thing ever, but this is because I live in Seattle. I still think tan legs look nicer than pale ones, but when I saw everyone in Mexico sunburnt or leathery it really hit home how gross tanning really is. If only the movie industry had taken off in England instead of Hollywood. (I'm not saying darker skin is automatically bad, but it's pretty obvious when it's bad for you.)

Date: 2005-05-13 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] doyouhaveaflag.livejournal.com
but self-tanners let you look tan without sun, so that you can get the hollywood tan look without damaging your skin. why is that bad?

Date: 2005-05-13 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
it's ugly!

Date: 2005-05-13 07:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thesadpunk.livejournal.com
Because your skin looks like that color "bittersweet" that nobody wanted to use from the crayola box of crayons.

Date: 2005-05-13 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cpf.livejournal.com
Self-tanners are like hair color - the results always look to uniform to be natural.

This post reminded me of a documentary on Imelda Marcos I watched the other night where George Hamilton was singing to her at one of her boat parties.

Whoops

Date: 2005-05-13 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cpf.livejournal.com
"Too"

Date: 2005-05-13 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gfrancie.livejournal.com
The women with leathery chests. I want to say, "look at yourself!!!!!! You look like an old saddle bag."

Date: 2005-05-14 03:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fritz-da-kat.livejournal.com
Hey, it's not as popular as it used to be in the eighties...

Profile

lauralh: (Default)
Laural Hill

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011121314 15
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 10:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios