um what?

Jan. 7th, 2005 10:40 am
lauralh: (cynical or sarcastic)
[personal profile] lauralh
"There's simply an irreconcilable contradiction between feminism and femininity, two largely incompatible strategies women have adopted over the years to try to level the playing field with men...Heterosexuality always was the Achilles heel of feminism because the asymmetries involved usually took the form of adequacy for one sex, inadequacy for the other."

where to begin?

Date: 2005-01-07 08:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
there's only one page.

basically I don't really think that Femininity is All About Getting A Man.

Date: 2005-01-07 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strukcher.livejournal.com
oh jeez... durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr... i thought the continue story link took me to a new page. not like i'm online all day or anything... jeez.

anyway -- that's an exceptionally good point that sorta blows the whole critque out of the water, huh?

Date: 2005-01-07 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bewing.livejournal.com
I agree with you, Laural. I also don't think that there is anything inherently "inadequate" about females within the idiom of Femininity. Which shoots down the other half of the critique.

Date: 2005-01-07 11:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
i guess what can you expect from a professor of media studies?

Profile

lauralh: (Default)
Laural Hill

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011121314 15
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 04:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios