some stuff

Oct. 19th, 2003 07:25 pm
lauralh: (Default)
[personal profile] lauralh
  • My hair covers my glasses now. I guess it's not that it looks bad, but this in-between stage is so hard to get to not-look-bad compared with the shorter hair that it drives me crazy. I'm all about the low-maintenance; I guess I should have just done this while I was unemployed instead, when I could totally just wear it in ugly barrettes and not care. Oh well. Another month and it'll be almost a bob, and um, even more trouble to take care of. Blargh. I don't know. I basically see that there are two haircuts that are low maintenance, the really short kind and the really long kind. If it's long enough I can just wash it before bed, and it frizzes up and actually looks good in the morning.

  • I pushed past my antisocial tendencies this weekend to take care of Boudoir, and go out Saturday night. Which was good, even if I did have to rely on chemicals to work up the nerve. But I saw [livejournal.com profile] xamichee for I guess the first time in a month, which was nice. We placed a bet, although I'm not sure if the 4:1 odds are in my favor or his. And also took a pic with me, him, and a girl whose name I've forgotten. Big Pimpin Yo.

  • Did get a lot of reading in, though... read the Sex and the City book (which is just a collection of those articles she wrote, I guess) and got halfway through Midnight's Children. So the book is really just icy and cold and not as funny as the show, a lot of the same stuff is covered, not as in depth of course. The humor that is there is stark and cold, and I think I'd die in new york. Anyway MC is pretty interesting though hella long and rambling. Not as bad as Eggers of course. heh.
  • Date: 2003-10-19 11:11 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] gfrancie.livejournal.com
    The Sex and the City book is kind of interesting, because you see less of a traditional sense of humour which is put forth in the show.

    Talk about a broad smarting from a nasty relationship. I don't think Bushnell really got over Mr. Big.

    Date: 2003-10-20 02:51 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] faustin.livejournal.com
    You mean Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children from 1980?

    How is it? How's the portrayal of India ---- is it informative, good, realistic background for a relatively ignorant american?

    I've had the book sitting on my shelves for years and never picked it up, but I must have found it interesting enough to buy at one point. (Ithaca library book-sell-off where I probably picked it up for $.25)

    Date: 2003-10-20 02:53 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com
    well i'm an ignorant american too, but it seems fairly realistic, i mean right now it's a kid living in Bombay in relative wealth, though.

    Profile

    lauralh: (Default)
    Laural Hill

    July 2017

    S M T W T F S
          1
    23456 78
    91011121314 15
    1617 1819202122
    23242526272829
    3031     

    Most Popular Tags

    Style Credit

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags
    Page generated Mar. 2nd, 2026 10:22 pm
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios