Page Summary
almosttruth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
patrick.livejournal.com - (no subject)
perich.livejournal.com - validation, we hardly knew ye
herbaliser.livejournal.com - my scrps
perich.livejournal.com - Re: my scrps
perich.livejournal.com - Here's a hint:
chris.livejournal.com - Re: Here's a hint:
perich.livejournal.com - perhaps it was a trick question
harryh.livejournal.com - Re: Here's a hint:
patrick.livejournal.com - Re: Here's a hint:
herbaliser.livejournal.com - Re: Here's a hint:
patrick.livejournal.com - Re: Here's a hint:
tyrven.livejournal.com - Re: Here's a hint:
perich.livejournal.com - Re: Here's a hint:
herbaliser.livejournal.com - you should read COLLAPSE!
bewing.livejournal.com - Don't worry, I'm working on it
tyrven.livejournal.com - Re: Here's a hint:
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-04-19 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-19 08:04 pm (UTC)validation, we hardly knew ye
Date: 2006-04-19 08:16 pm (UTC)my scrps
Date: 2006-04-19 08:17 pm (UTC)candid
crasch
endquote
gnat
interimlover
oldgirl
perich
studentism/drugs
xaotica
Re: my scrps
Date: 2006-04-19 08:32 pm (UTC)Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-19 08:33 pm (UTC)Re: Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-19 08:43 pm (UTC)perhaps it was a trick question
Date: 2006-04-19 08:47 pm (UTC)Re: Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-19 08:52 pm (UTC)Re: Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-19 09:03 pm (UTC)Re: Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-19 09:04 pm (UTC)Re: Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-19 09:35 pm (UTC)Re: Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-20 02:39 am (UTC)But I don't think oil will be the limiting resource, at least not for the developed world: we can always build fusion reactors. And I'm sure once the first one is finished in France the cost will go down.
Re: Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-20 11:34 am (UTC)I'll be honest - I can't think of one. I can think of resource crashes that accelerated a government's failure, but none where "running out of bauxite" was the sole cause.
you should read COLLAPSE!
Date: 2006-04-20 03:15 pm (UTC)Don't worry, I'm working on it
Date: 2006-04-20 06:20 pm (UTC)As tryven said, fusion power is the best. It does not end up creating nearly as much radioactive waste as any fission reactor would -- what people usually mean by "nuclear". With research, I may have a working design in my head right now for a fusion reactor.
But in the meantime, until fusion actually comes online, I think geothermal power is the best choice -- instead of hydro. I definitely have a design in mind for a geothermal plant that could supply city sized quantities of megawatts, using the typical kinds of geothermal sources that you find around (called low-Q, in the lingo).
As soon as it becomes financially attractive, people will pay me to build such things. Until then, they won't. And, of course, I am not unique. There must be many inventors out there, who all have working concepts in their heads. Maybe someone can scrape enough cash together to build and demonstrate a prototype before oil hits $100 a barrel, and it's "needed" -- but maybe not.
One thing that I can tell you is that it is already a mathematic/economic/scientific fact that it is strictly impossible to collect enough "renewable" energy to power current human consumption.
Re: Here's a hint:
Date: 2006-04-20 07:44 pm (UTC)