lauralh: (pirate queen)
Laural Hill ([personal profile] lauralh) wrote2006-09-29 11:34 am
Entry tags:

why do retail sites still do this?

design annoyances

1) Popup windows
2) resizing the main window
3) popup windows that you can't resize
4) flash that needs to "load" before you can navigate the page
5) animation that replays every time you go to the site

and finally I get super-annoyed with 100% flash sites, so you can't link to a product itself.

edit: why the fuck did everyone comment on this and not alien abductions?

[identity profile] skipbreakfast.livejournal.com 2006-09-29 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
You don't need Flash to have content management and control.

[identity profile] jimbojones.livejournal.com 2006-09-29 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Depends on whether you're developing for IE or Firefox. IE will let a developer deny the user access to controls, FF won't - especially if the user has specifically reconfigured FF to disallow invasive changes.

But if you design everything in a Flash object, even in FF the only thing you can do outside the dev's explicit design is resize the entire object.

[identity profile] skipbreakfast.livejournal.com 2006-09-29 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you saying it's a security risk?

[identity profile] jimbojones.livejournal.com 2006-09-29 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Am I saying what is a security risk...?

[identity profile] skipbreakfast.livejournal.com 2006-09-29 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
FF users being able to play with stuff?

[identity profile] jimbojones.livejournal.com 2006-09-29 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Good god no, it's the other way around. The ability of a web *developer* to deny control to a web *user* is a security risk.

[identity profile] toastednut.livejournal.com 2006-09-30 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
flash dev != ui designer.