lauralh: (cynical or sarcastic)
Laural Hill ([personal profile] lauralh) wrote2005-09-27 01:31 pm
Entry tags:

omg what?

Glancing at the Banned Books list, Reg and I have become confused.

[livejournal.com profile] velvet: I mean, i can understand The New Joy of Gay Sex
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: but To Kill a Mockingbird?
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: this is my question:
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: yeah.
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: THE HELL?
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: or
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: heh, american psycho.,
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: why the fuck is judy blume all over the place?
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: do people just not want their children reading?
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: b/c she talks about sex and masturbation and periods
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: UNNATURAL
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: now this
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: they don't even say it in that book more than twice
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: Where’s Waldo? by Martin Hanford
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: Wtf.
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: HAHAHAHAHA
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: How to Eat Fried Worms by Thomas Rockwell
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: it was written in the FIFTIES
[livejournal.com profile] herbaliser: you may as well ban The Mouse and the Motorcycle
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: little black sambo? WTF?@!?!?!
[livejournal.com profile] velvet: btw, the mouse and the motorcycle rulz.

[identity profile] disarrayed.livejournal.com 2005-09-27 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Hehe, this book ban shit just really makes no sense. Censorship as a whole is getting seriously screwy nowadays. I read about Oliver Stone or someone of the nature doing a 9/11 film about the Trade Center events, but that they can not use people falling from buildings nor the planes striking, and certainly no rubble. Apparently, they want the drama without the cause, which makes no sense.

[identity profile] herbaliser.livejournal.com 2005-09-27 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
that's funny.

the list is actually the books parents want banned.