proof is in the price?
Feb. 1st, 2002 11:19 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I personally don't like paying a lot of money for a logo or a brand, but I have to admit that a lot of times the extra money goes for quality. Sometimes it doesn't, but often it does. I don't see a big difference in prices on soaps, usually, but hair conditioner has a wide variation. Food quality often has a high correlation to price, especially non-bulk items. Chocolate? You definitely get what you pay for there, as evidenced by the bag of M&M's versus the bag of Dove chocolates. Guess which one empties faster.
Am I right or wrong?
Am I right or wrong?
no subject
Date: 2002-02-01 04:35 pm (UTC)it's true though, about paying for quality. everyone knows that it's worth paying more for a giant killer python rather than a regular one.
mmm, giant killer python
Date: 2002-02-01 06:00 pm (UTC)